Have Covid-19 Deaths Been Undercounted? New Reports Say ‘Yes’ and Here’s Why It Matters.
“COVID-19 has had a much bigger footprint than we have estimated so far,” says Professor Brook Baker ‘76.
Search Results for https:/www.iniuria.us/forum/member.php
Search Results for https:/www.iniuria.us/forum/member.php
How the First-Ever U.S. Energy Justice Leader Develops Ideas
In an interview with MIT Sloan, Professor Shalanda Baker ’05, the new (and first-ever) deputy director of energy justice at the US Department of Energy, talks about how she develops and works with big ideas.
Supreme Court Rundown: Will Roe Survive?
Listen back: Brigitte Amiri ’99, deputy director of the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project, joined Ms. magazine's On the Issues podcast to unpack the issues at stake in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — a pending U.S. Supreme Court case that some believe could overturn Roe v. Wade.
PHRGE Marks Human Rights Day with Release of New Report by Linnea Brandt ’22
To mark #HumanRightsDay, Northeastern Law's Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy (PHRGE) has released a new publication, “Disconnected: How Household Water Shutoffs in the United States During the COVID Pandemic Violate the Human Right to Water.”
She Climbed Her Way To the Top. Now She’s Helping Others Do the Same.
Betty Francisco '98, general counsel at Compass Working Capital and co-founder of Amplify Latinx, is profiled by Northeastern News.
The Supreme Court Will Hear an Abortion Case. What Comes Next?
By agreeing to hear an abortion case out of Mississippi that the state’s lower courts ruled was plainly unconstitutional under the landmark Roe v. Wade, the justices indicated that the nation’s highest court may seek to change the abortion standard, say Professors Aziza Ahmed and Dan Urman.
Is the Supreme Court Doing Away With the Separation of Church and State?
Two recent high court decisions threaten to tear down the so-called “wall of separation” between church and state, says Professor Claudia Haupt.
Did the Conservative Justices Commit Perjury? Here’s What They Said Under Oath About Roe v. Wade
SCOTUS justices did not commit perjury, says Professor Dan Urman, but their careful lawyerly phrasing demonstrated their stance on Roe v Wade.
Biden’s Workplace Vaccine Rules Hit Republican Judge Blockade
“We’re putting our heads in the sand if we ignore the way partisanship has come to impact how judges see issues,” Professor Wendy Parmet, faculty director of Northeastern Law's Center for Health Policy and Law, tells Bloomberg Law.
New "Compromise" on an IP Waiver for Covid Vaccines Is Worse Than No Deal, Activists Say
“Even if vaccines were the only consideration, overriding patents alone is not enough,” Professor Brook Baker, senior policy analyst for Health GAP, tells In These Times magazine.